The data AI can't get is already in your PSA.

A model can describe an outage. It is much worse at resolving one, because the record of how real problems actually get fixed lives inside private ticketing systems rather than on the open web. An MSP holds years of exactly that: the symptom, the diagnosis, the three things that didn't work, and the one that did.

This assessment scores how licensable your records are. Eight questions, about five minutes, and no access to your systems.

Anonymised & client-safe No system access No obligation

Troveo licenses data on behalf of the people who own it. If yours isn't licensable yet, the assessment will tell you that, and what would change it.

Sample result

0 100

74/100

Strong opportunity

  • Ticket richness
  • Scale & flow
  • Rights & delivery
  • History depth
Illustrative only — your own factor breakdown is built from your answers.
A score, and the honest version of it
0–100 on a heat meter that runs from "not an opportunity yet" to "ideal dataset" — and plenty of practices get the first answer
The six factors a buyer weighs
ticket richness, scale and flow, rights, history depth, process maturity, and stack spread — with your points shown on each
Your stack, read the way a buyer reads it
PSA and RMM first, because that is where resolution data lives — then security, documentation and the rest
Where the demand actually is
which parts of an MSP's records are being licensed right now, and what a practice your size can realistically do next